Pareto Analysis
Rank loss categories, calculate cumulative contribution and focus improvement on the few categories that dominate the selected measure.
Rank loss categories, calculate cumulative contribution and focus improvement on the few categories that dominate the selected measure.
Rank losses or defects and identify the few categories responsible for the largest share of the effect.
Use Pareto to prioritize limited improvement resources according to frequency, cost, time or another measurable impact.
Pareto analysis prioritises consequences, not root causes. The ranking changes when the measure changes from count to cost, time, severity or another impact.
Rank loss categories, calculate cumulative contribution and focus improvement on the few categories that dominate the selected measure.
Define the decision and the impact measure
Clean and combine equivalent categories
Aggregate values for one comparable period
Sort descending and calculate cumulative share
Investigate the leading categories for causes
Scratch defects occur most often, but missing welds create the highest rework cost. Two Pareto charts lead to different but transparent priorities.
Mixing counts, costs and durations in one chart
Using unstable category names
Assuming the largest category is the root cause
Applying an 80% cut-off mechanically
Prepare consistent categories, selected impact measure, values and observation period.
The module produces sorted Pareto chart, cumulative curve and selected priority categories.
No. Treat the output as a structured engineering and improvement aid. Verify source data, assumptions, safety, quality, legal requirements and local process conditions with competent responsible people before implementation.
Pareto Analysis
Rank loss categories, calculate cumulative contribution and focus improvement on the few categories that dominate the selected measure.